| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Big Muscle Guest
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2004 5:31 pm Post subject: Increase min download block size to 65535 |
|
|
What is it ??? Increase min download block size to 65535
Does it some influence on performance ??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rc Guest
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:00 am Post subject: Re: Increase min download block size to 65535 |
|
|
because too slow sources is auto dropped. This will not influence your download performance. Pls don't worry abou it.
| Big Muscle wrote: | What is it ??? Increase min download block size to 65535
Does it some influence on performance ??? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I am programming my own DC++ klient with segmented downloading. Is it the minimal segment size ??? And if it is equal to file size, only one segment will be used ??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rc Guest
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: | | I am programming my own DC++ klient with segmented downloading. Is it the minimal segment size ??? And if it is equal to file size, only one segment will be used ??? |
Yes. Decided by your implemetation.
RevConnect use 65535, because 64K = incoming buffer size.
and all source below 1kB/s is dropped.
So in the worst case, it will cost 1 min to download the last block. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| OK. But if I set buffer to 1024K, isn't it better set block size to 1024K ??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
_liny Guest
|
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 12:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, no problem at all.
| Anonymous wrote: | | OK. But if I set buffer to 1024K, isn't it better set block size to 1024K ??? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bolibompa
Joined: 30 Mar 2008 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How do I change the block size? I now have 2mb and it is really sucks when downloading a movie.
Please help me  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|